17 Nov
2009

City vs Suburb Transportation Costs

Posted by easy eco blog

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Gas prices are on the way up. It is logical that living in a city would reduce transportation costs compared to living in the suburbs.  You could ride mass transit, walk, or bike to work or to errands and restaurants.

A recent study by the Urban Land Institute quantifies the additional costs incurred in the San Francisco Bay Area by suburbanites. “Bay Area Burden: Examining the costs and impacts of housing and transportation on Bay Area residents, their neighborhoods and the environment.” It shows that there is a disconnect between where people work and where they live resulting in wasted time commuting and money spend on cars and gas.

San Francisco has a household median income of $66,523 and estimated monthly transportation costs of $792.  Moving to suburbs greatly increases transportation costs. Antioch $1311, Livermore $1281, Redwood City $1064, Novato $1246.

They arrived at the figures using block-level census household information and modeling factors such as population density and transportation options.

Live closer to work and you will also increase your happiness.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Related posts:

  1. PG&E Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) to Lower Energy Costs
  2. Donating Food to the Hungry
  3. Solar Panel Installation – Site Planning
  4. Building Commissioning – Saving Energy in Buildings
  5. Chicken Safety – Salmonella, Campylobacter bacteria

Posted on November 17th, 2009
If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to our RSS feed.

Leave a Reply

Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name.